Button for menue
  • Dear Readers!

    There are some things in life that are unavoidable simply because it is impossible to foresee them. Other things though could have been prevented if those involved had been perhaps a little more mindful and taken that all important look ahead. Would the Titanic have hit the iceberg at full speed, if Captain Smith and his crew had seen the ice before it was too late? Very unlikely. They had received ice warnings but the ocean was calm and everyone was fine on board the ship. The majority of the passengers were in good spirits – right up until the collision happened. We humans are in a pretty similar position in the 21st Century. We have received warnings about the impending effects of climate change and we have been told that supplies of natural resources are already running low – and yet we are still sailing at full speed towards a head-on collision. Despite the fact that the UN recently officially confirmed that the world’s population will have reached 10 billion people by 2050. 10 billion who will all want to live as comfortably as we Europeans already do today with our 22-tonne consumption of raw materials per capita per year. China, for example, currently only consumes 11 tonnes per person per year. We continue, for the most part, to turn a blind eye to the fact that our planet simply does not have enough raw materials for such a scenario and – even if there are sufficient supplies of some materials – it would not be particularly smart to continue to mine and consume them in such large quantities if the problems of climate change are to be overcome. 

    Maybe human nature lies at the root of the problem. Our lives run in a straight line – from when they begin, to when they end. Linear thinking is in our genes so to speak. And this is precisely how we have always developed and made our products since we used the very first axe. From the idea at the beginning, to using the product, all the way through to the final moment when the product is broken and can no longer be used. There is no afterwards. If a sustainable economy is to be created, however, it is high time that this line is transformed into a circle.

    Practicable solutions to solving our supply problems have been around for a long while now. All around the world, people have been carrying out research work to find new technologies and better systems to enable raw materials to be recovered so that they can be reused. Recycling must finally do what its name implies, i.e. create loops so that all raw materials can be returned to production cycles. Economic growth and the consumption of raw materials must become separate from one another. A few major steps must be taken before that is possible though. Firstly, an ecodesign directive needs to be introduced across Europe that not only places importance on energy efficiency (as is the case at the moment) but also on raw material efficiency and the recyclability of products. Secondly, far more money needs to be invested in researching, developing and setting up more and better sorting and recycling facilities to ensure the recovered raw materials are of the highest possible quality. And thirdly, politicians need to create incentives to encourage industrial businesses to use more recycled raw materials in their production processes. Digitalisation and e-mobility, in particular, need huge volumes of raw materials. The most environmentally friendly source – one that also allows us to remain independent – is recycled raw materials.

    Our steamship is still more or less intact but it continues to sail towards a head-on collision with Mother Nature. It is not too late to change course, though, if we reach the right conclusions and take some mindful and far-sighted steps towards more and better recycling. There are plenty of reasons to be optimistic – quite a few of which can be found in this issue. 


    Ludger Rethmann

An eye on the climate goals

  • The GPP 2020 project aims to considerably increase awareness of green public procurement across Europe in order to help ensure the EU’s 2020 goals are reached: a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% increase in the share of renewable energy and a 20% increase in energy efficiency.

Special software for tenders & calculations

As the name suggests, green public tenders focus on both reducing energy consumption and cutting carbon emis-sions. Special software has been created to help local au-thorities implement such tenders and training courses are also available to teach users about the software’s different tools. Initial calculations show the decision-makers and procurers what savings can be achieved with an environ-mentally friendly tender. Thanks to this project, more than 100 low-carbon tenders have already been implemented in the eight participating countries – all of which have had an immediate impact: carbon emissions have been reduced by 922,000 tonnes and energy consumption by 1,800 MWh.

  • An opportunity for every local authority

    The GPP 2020 project has made it very clear that this  is a simple way for both central and local government  to lead by example. They can choose to promote efforts  to protect the environment and curb climate change without having to depend on laws or on industry having to undergo change. When it comes to achieving the EU’s 2020 goals, the most important feature of a public tender must no longer be the price.

    100 low-carbon tenders have already been implemented, reducing CO2 emissions by 922,000 tonnes.

    By setting clear requirements (such as to what extent carbon emissions and/or energy consumption should be cut), local authorities can send a clear signal and provide industry with an incentive to run a low-carbon busi-ness without having to draw up new rules and regulations. These principles have not yet been taken up by all member states, but – as far as the recycling sector is concerned – they are something that every local authority should strive towards. 

© 2022 REMONDIS SE & Co. KG  | Imprint | Privacy & Cookies | Image credits